Algal Biomass

In addition to that, access to vitamin C dioxide and pissing beessential. still though micro algae rotter produce in the presence of saline piss,fresh irrigate is needed in a raceway pond system to address for the evaporative outrage depending on the wind velocity, air temperature, and humidity level of thelocation. Temperature is an important broker in bio sens cultivation.Most algaegrow conk out in readyer climates ranging from 25-40?. Tropical locations with auniformly warm temperature throughout the year (Chisti, 2016), end trifle as perfectlocations for algaculture as the temperature doesnt baffle to be monitored at alltimes, and the algae burn imbibe adapt to local conditions.There ar however some drawbacks while using raceway pond systems, thatrender them sometimes ineffective.Since, carbon dioxide is required to acceleratethe exertion of microalgae, an accumulation of oxygen base lolly out as a hindrance tothe cover. There is no known chemical instrum ent in a raceway pond, that helps curb thisaccumulation of oxygen. Peak sunlight hours during the sidereal day can hamper with thephotosynthesis, as the level of oxygen may join on to up to three times of the levelin saturated water. For this reason, smaller raceway ponds come across better resultsthan larger ponds with watch to oxygen removal, and in turn better productivity.A nonher issue with race slipway is the contamination collectible to exposure to rain, dust andother debris. small ponds may be placed inside, but that cant be said for largerponds. Filtration can help inhibit infestations and contamination of the ponds, but thatis an expensive process.The yield court of biomass with race slipway is considered to be the leastexpensive option.The cost of a pond depends on the pillowcase of ease it is built in,plastic lined earthen raceways argon the least expensive alternatives with their totalcost of pull suming to be rightly $70,000 per hect be, whereasponds encl osed in greenho characters or covered facilities argon to a greater extent expensive as theyprotect from contamination. Raceways require least amount of corking investmentand therefore re main the system of choice, despite their low productivity anddrawbacks.Photo-bioreactors (PBRs)A photo-bioreactor is a closed equipment which provides a controlledenvironment and enables noble productivity of algae.PBRs curb all the problems thatargon go somewhat in raceways ponds, ilk carbon dioxide supply, temperature, optimaloxygen levels, pH levels etc. There argon two types of photo-bioreactors- bland-plate andand tubular. Both PBRs are made of transparent materials for maximum solar light get-up-and-go absorption. Flat-plate PBRs are suitable for mass cultivation of algae,be arrest high photosynthetic efficiencies can be achieved. Tubular PBRs aresuitable for outdoor cultivation, and are constructed with either glass or plastic tubes.Systems covering large areas outdoors, consist of tu bes exposed to sunlight and canbe operated either in batches or continuously. Photo-bioreactors usually get down a4water pool as a temperature control system in order to prevent the tubes fromoverheating as they act as solar receptors. They also rich person built in cleanup systemfor the tubes without stopping production.Fundamentally, using photo-bioreactorsare more advantageous than using raceways for many reasons, like cultivation ofalgae under controlled environments resulting in high productivity, protection fromcontamination, space-saving and larger advance to volume ratio. However there aresome limitations prone to PBRs the capital cost is in truth high which is impedingthe progress of microalgae biofuel production, in spite of larger production levels.Also, entropy from the past two decades has shown that the productivity in an enclosePBR is not much higher than that achieved in open-pond cultures.3. Environmental Limitations of Microalgae CultivationAs with all large scale leaf productions, wide scale microalgae biofuel productioncould contribute diverse environmental impacts. Water is a critical comp int of the biofuelproduction processes, in both raceway-ponds and PBRs.With the certain globalwater crisis, using large amounts of fresh water to compensate for evaporation inopen ponds or to cool PBRs, renders the system economically unviable. seawater orbrackish water may be used in these functions, but have to be filtered in order toprevent infestation of bacteria, and contamination. Recirculating water is acealternative to curb the wont of water, but that has risks of virus infestations, and theresidues of previously destroyed algae cells.Filtration systems are expensive, andfactor in with the lack of cost effectiveness of these systems.Most microalgae production farms have to be find close to the equator inorder to ensure high levels of production due to the uniformity of the climate, andadequate amount of solar radiation. Another fact or is the type of land and terrain thefarm is located in, for example to install a large raceway pond, a relatively flat land isrequired. The addition of nutrients and fertilisers like nitrogen and phosphorus is alsoessential for algaculture.The amount of nutrients and fertilisers to be usedadditionally depends on the s oil colour porosity and permeability of the land. Algalcultivation requires a lot of fertilisers to make up for the compensation for fogy fuels.Researching and budgeting nutrients and fertilisers is a key concern in query anddevelopment of microalgae cultivation.Algal cultivation requires usance of fossil fuels continuously in a plethora ofways, ranging from electricity consumption during cultivation and natural bollix used todry the algae for production. In PBRs, the temperature control for cooling the pipesfrom overheating increases the use of fossil fuels. This use of fossil fuels in algaebiofuel production is paradoxical to the cause and a dire need to optim ise the systemto minimise the energy usage is established.That being said, microalgae cultivationfaces a variety of environmental challenges, coming from the location to the type of5algae. Energy conservation and water management are two of the main challengesto be conquered to make the system sustainable in the futurity.4. Cost EffectivenessThe cost of algae biofuel production is essential to establish to know howsustainable this system can be in the future. The cost of biofuel production dependson a variety of factors, such(prenominal) as the the yield of the biomass, geographical location, oilcontent, scale of production systems etc.Presently, microalgae biofuel production isstill more expensive than normal diesel fuels because of the ongoing R&D, and theambiguity of current knowledge. Chisti in 2007 approximated the cost of productionof algal-oils from a PBR with an annual production capacity of 10,000 gobs per yearand estimated the cost of $2.80 per litre, considering the oil content to be 30% in thealgae used. This theme is exclusive of the algal oil to biodiesel reincarnation costs,logistics, marketing costs and taxes. collectible to these high costs of algal-fuel, the utmostimportance during research should be given to cost-saving itself, in an start out tomake biofuel from microalgae affordable enough to be commercialised in the nearfuture.Open pond systems would ideally be the most economically viable way tocultivate microalgae biofuel, but not without its set of intrinsic disadvantagesdiscussed earlier in this research paper.As the applied science gets increasinglyadvanced, the cost factor multiplies as well making the entire process a lot lesseconomical than what was started with first hand. Improved yield of biomass andnutrient oils (or lipids) would make the production costs drop rapidly.Moreover, to reduce the production costs alternative ways to manage energy andwater consumption have to be devised, a change design for PBRs is necessary. Substitutes for fresh water like wastewater and flue gases can contribute to lowercosts of production.Biofuel ProductionThe rapid growth of environmental pollution by the usage of accomplishedfossil fuels has sparked a lot of concern globally. The research and development foralternative fuels is one of the principal focuses for every country in an attempt for asustainable and promising future on this planet for all generations. Various optionsare available to us to help us make this shift, however to find a sustainable methodwhich is as promising as it is economically viable is a global challenge.Currently,biomass derived fuels depend to be the most optimistic path.Various ways of harvesting algae have been discussed in this paper, the next step istypically to process the algae in a series of steps which differ from species to6species. One of the most important approaches in biomass production isHydrothermal Liquefaction or HTL.5.1 Hydrothermal LiquefactionHydrothermal Liquefactio n employes a continuous process that subjectsharvested wet algae to high temperatures and pressures (Elliot, 2013).Convertingsolid biomass to fluidness fuels is not a spontaneous process. The liquid fuels derivedfrom fossil fuels on a large scale took thousands of years to vary biomass tocrude oil and gas. In act day, there are many modern passage technologies toobtain liquefied fuels from various biomasses, these mutation technologies canfundamentally be classified into biochemical and thermochemical conversion.Biochemical mass usually has low energy density, high moisture content and doesnot have a very viscous physical form.Thermochemical conversions in comparisonare much more viscous as they are converted at very high temperatures in highpressures in the presence of catalysts that make the conversions much more rapid.Simply, Hydrothermal Liquefaction is the thermochemical conversion of biomassinto liquid fuels by processing in a hot, pressurized environment for fitting tim e tobreak down into solid bio polymeric structure to mainly liquid components(Gollakota, 2017).Microalgae is, amongst all possible biomass sources, the most efficientand reliable source of wet biomass due to its high photosynthetic efficiency,maximum production levels, and its rapid growth in intimately all environments. Overthe years, many thermochemical conversions have made their way, and while eachhas their pros and cons, HTL has come a farseeing way as one of the most appropriateprocesses to tackle thermochemical conversion of wet biomass.Many scientists overthe years have done extensive research pertaining to the development ofhydrothermal liquefaction, such as Beckmann and Elliott who studied the propertiesof oil obtained from HTL of biomass, and gave crucial inputs with respect to the kindof catalysts and other parameters are pertinent to the HTL process to ensuresignificant productivity.5.2 Process MechanismCurrently, the knowledge about HTL process implements is qualita tive andneeds a lot more space for research.The mechanism comprises of three majorsteps depolymerisation, decomposition and recombination. The chemistry behind allthese processes is very complex as the biomass is a complex smorgasbord ofcarbohydrates, proteins, oils etc. Each working mechanism of hydrothermalliquefaction is discussed below.5.2.1 Depolymerisation7In this process the macromolecules of the biomass are dissolves through theirphysical and chemical properties.Depolymerisation makes it easier for the biomassto overcome its natural qualities and start behaving like fossil fuels. It mimics thegeological processes, that are involved in the production of conventional fossil fuels.The process first grounds the feedstock material into small chunks and mixes it withwater, if the feedstock is fry. This mixture is then put into a pressure vessel reactionchamber where it is heated at a constant volume at a temperature of 250?, themixture is held in these conditions for approximately 15 minutes at the end of whichthe pressure is released and most of the water is boiled off.The resultant concoctionconsists of crude hydrocarbons and solid minerals. The minerals are removed andthe hydrocarbons are sent to the second stage.The disadvantage of this process is that it only breaks down long molecular(a)chains into shorter ones, this implies that smaller molecules like carbon dioxide ormethane cannot be broken down save by depolymerisation.Decomposition or DehydrationThe second stage of hydrothermal liquefaction involves the loss of the watermolecule, the carbon dioxide molecule and the acid content. Water at high pressuresand temperatures breaks down the hydrogen bonded structure of celluloses and inturn forms glucose monomers. This is how HTL provides an alternative processroute from microalgae biofuels to hydrocarbon liquid fuels.5.2.3 RecombinationThis is the last step in HTL which is reverse of the two previous processesbecause of the absence of the hydrogen comp ound.The free radicals are largelyavailable which in turn recombine or repolymerise to form high molecular weight charcompounds.5.3 Hydrothermal Liquefaction of MicroalgaeThe main advantage of using HTL for microalgae is that it doesntrequire the predrying of feedstock, yet ensuring a relatively high production. Theprocess of HTL applied to microalgae is similar to treating cellulose but with a fewdifferences, the major one being treating wed feedstock as opposed to dryfeedstock.One of the principally researched issues that testament ensure high productivityis a high lipid yield, which is necessary to convert microalgae into biodiesel. Theeffect of significant variables, such as temperature, pressure, volume, biomassconcentration and compositions of algae, catalysts et al. is still under research.During hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae, a demythologised heat management system8must be put in place that ensures energy efficiency and separation of the endproduct.Current Situat ion Future ViabilityIn open day, pertaining to all the advantages and disadvantages of HTL,there is sufficient proof that HTL has potential to become a commercialisedtechnology in the future.Biofuels produced using hydrothermal liquefaction are absent of carbon, thisimplies that there are no carbon emissions produced when the biofuel is burnt.Materials like algae use photosynthesis to grow, and therefore use the carbondioxide already present in the atmosphere.The carbon imprint produced by biofuelsis exponentially lower than what is already being experienced by conventional fossilfuels. Hydrothermal Liquefaction is a clean process, which doesnt suffering theenvironment by producing harmful gases like ammonia or sulphur. If the technologyis mastered, HTL can coat the way for clean algal biofuels globally, although thereare still a number of challenges to be overcome.ConclusionThe cultivation and production of microalgae biofuels is swiftly developing andis receiving attention and funding from global leaders. The rapid increase in worldpopulation, and hence the energy invite is a siren call to devise an alternativeenergy source. Microalgaes versatile qualities make it a promising path to tread onwhen it comes to biofuels. There are various ways to derive biofuels from algae aswe saw in this paper, and also many challenges attached with them.Bio-oil obtainedfrom various processes suffers from various drawbacks such as a high oxygencontent, imbalance etc, therefore an optimal technique to efficiently convert biomassto biofuel should be researched in order to be able to commercialise the use ofbiofuels in the near future. Making biofuels economically viable in the future is a bigchallenge in itself.Even though, photo-bioreactors promise a bright future in scathe ofbiofuel cultivation, the overhead costs attached from cultivating the biofuel to makingit market ready and selling it are still quite high. These high costs of biofuels ascompared to conventional fossil fuels are what render them unready forcommercialisation. However, even with theoretical development and research, abright future for microalgae fossil fuels presents itself.